Hosting companies seem to have the same packages since 2006 - 512 MB RAM, 40 GB disk, etc... What kind of hosting companies are you using these days? Any new and innovative ones out there?
using http://stormondemand.com/ (liquid web). When we started, a year or so ago, we ran unixbench on a few of their servers, linode and ec2. I don't remember the results, but I remember Storm won across the board (and, in some cases, like disk IO, by huge margins).
I had 30 second downtime last week. First time.
I like that they offer, ok priced, dedicated machines (though I'm on their "bare-metal" machines for now).
The only problem is that they don't innovate. They are where AWS was back when it started. Shared storage...dns...virtual ips..load balancers...queues...(and the list goes on), doesn't exist.
I use Dreamhost for my little sites that I don't pay much attention to and AWS for anything bigger. I recently deployed some rails apps on Heroku and have been loving it so I will probably be using that for a while.
An acquaintance of mine actually runs his own hosting company. Feel free to check it out. I don't believe they offer windows solutions, pretty much just Linux based server support, but I could be wrong.
In terms of the hosting providers I've worked with in a professional capacity, they've all had their ups and downs.
I couldn't really recommend one over the other, but a lot of people seem keen on Rackspace, and I don't think anyone has ever told me that they enjoyed dealing with 1and1.
Agreed, I use them as a general host and test area, although I'm hoping to try out some other "PaaS" inc. Heroku soon. Still, a good place for anyone who just wants something simple.
Ruby Ring Tech [http://rubyringtech.com/]. Dirt cheap, and in principle unmetered. (As I have not tried to test this claim, I just get the peace of mind I look for in unmetered plans.) Yes, they are probably <99% in uptime, but then I expected that, as my sites are just learning sandboxes.
I believe they are tacky and shady in explicitly soliciting for adult content providers, but bear in mind that pretty much everybody is happy to host it, unless we're talking about illegal content. You'll have a field day if you traceroute any of the major porn sites. Or, to take everybody's darling, AWS, consider [1]. My bet is that pretty much everybody is glad to do business with adult content providers; they are just quiet about it...
Been happily hosting my own personal content on my own hosting company for nearly a decade now. Can't go wrong when you're signing the paycheques and need support.
(Owning a hosting company has a few perks, finally!)
As for innovators are concerned, Linode is doing good stuff. Can't think of anyone else in the space doing anything remotely interesting quite frankly.
I don't know about new or innovative, but a recent post comparing VPS performance ("http://journal.uggedal.com/vps-performance-comparison/) concluded that Linode gives the best bang for your buck, at least in the low cost ($20/month) space.
Live servers: LiquidWeb (Physical and virtual, not StormOnDemand but we have 12 big servers with them so they cut us a special deal). Dev/messing about servers: OVH - Dirt cheap, functional, decent hardware, but don't expect support if something goes wrong
I use Webbynode for my personal projects, awesome deployment process, and cheap.
Joyent Cloud is my pick for the bigger apps I run. Pretty similar to AWS, about the same price, way better performance. Just my two cents.
Using modwest for PHP based sites for years. Been stable as a rock. The only knock has been they are slow to add new plugins but probably the reason they are very stable.
No, we will not. Our design skills are horrifyingly bad anyway. We like to stick to what we're good at, which is hosting sites, not creating them. Our current public site reflects this.
Been wondering the same. I am stuck on godaddy for several of our company's sites and they are driving me nuts for both operational and political reasons!
Hostgator's 10/mth plan and cpanel is plenty easy for me to put all my simple forums and blogs on.
I set up my university design department with Dreamhost because it's easy for the layman and you can add multiple accounts with different lvls of access. If you need that...
I hear MT is good like AWS if you are like to configure everything on your own.
I had 30 second downtime last week. First time.
I like that they offer, ok priced, dedicated machines (though I'm on their "bare-metal" machines for now).
The only problem is that they don't innovate. They are where AWS was back when it started. Shared storage...dns...virtual ips..load balancers...queues...(and the list goes on), doesn't exist.
If I wasn't such a cheap ass, I'd use Amazon.