Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why four? Why not one?


Someone responded to you when you left this same comment on a previous thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29835132


It's perfectly fine to ask the same question to a new audience. There might be different answers. Not everyone saw it the first time.

My answer to op, assuming they're not being facetious:

- We need time to recharge and let our brains work asynchronously on problems.

- We need more coordination and integration points with colleagues. If we're steamrolling ahead, there's little chance to coordinate.

- Quality of work begins to suffer after a certain point and reaches diminishing returns.

- Expending that much effort at once, repeatedly, likely leads to incredible burnout.

- Personally, the will to do Herculean tasks isn't a renewable resource you can tap into week over week. It happens, but it depletes. There have to be breaks.


I think that over time, the Overton window of what's acceptable will slowly shrink to 4 hours a week. But it'll be the optionality of work, like the 4-hour-work week, rather than a work-to-survive model we currently live in


What would help me at my job is just having the benefits/money to feel appreciative of the job. Instead I feel exploited. The easiest way is 4-10s. Working 8-6 daily and having a 3 day workweek would make me so much happier with my life. I would LOVE to have 3 days with my family, and would likely never leave the job.


I didn’t even know anyone responded. Thanks


Why five ? why not a seven day week?


I'm sure people said the same thing when we went from a 7 day workweek to a 5 day workweek.


Sometimes it blows my mind that every 5 days I get two days off. You're off almost 30% of every week by default.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: