Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Later caselaw (note that that case was from 1919) gives directors widespread latitude to decide what "benefiting the corporation" means.

The second paragraph gives two such cases: AP Smith Manufacturing Co v. Barlow and Shlensky v. Wrigley.



This actually just makes it worse if (plausible) Zuck is a sadist.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: