Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Much fewer people on the same amount of roads and sewer systems means spending way more per capita to maintain and build them. Way more than the tax base can provide, even.

This is simply false. Maintaining roads takes typically less than 10% of the budget of the municipality. Additionally, road construction and maintenance is significantly more time consuming and expensive in dense urban areas.

> On top of that, neighborhoods that are spread out require more people to drive cars, which not only increases the maintenance burden, but also requires loads of parking lots at grocery stores. And none of that grocery store parking lot is going to generate the tax income required to pay for the infrastructure needed to travel there.

Huh? The grocery store’s parking is part of grocery store, which generates tax income.



Per capita, costs to support people in dense urban areas is lower than that of suburban areas [1].

[1] https://usa.streetsblog.org/2015/03/05/sprawl-costs-the-publ...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: