This is such crap. While in theory you’re right, it ignores the biggest difference.
With politicians ever person only gets one vote, theoretically equal power to force change.
With corporations, the number of votes a person gets is directly related to their bank balance. There’s no such thing as equal power for the people, only the rich get to vote.
That is exactly how we got the planet to its current state: if you give more power to the numbers you'll encourage more numbers. Maybe it's time to give more weight to another human accomplishment than reproduction, like to the value created.
But I don't hear governments giving more voting rights to more populous countries, instead it's to the "more developed" (PIB) and "more powerful" (military) both proxies for wealth.
Well that’s clearly not true. Not sure if you noticed but most democratic developed countries are on the verge of population decline.
Not to mention a big chunk of human progress happened well before the development of democracy. Actually the worst aspects of human development seem to have been driving primarily by greed and wealth accumulation. The thing you seem to be advocating for.
Or to the value stolen. You have to understand that by giving state power to the wealthy, they will declare their own actions legitimate and the actions of the poor to be illegitimate.
With politicians ever person only gets one vote, theoretically equal power to force change.
With corporations, the number of votes a person gets is directly related to their bank balance. There’s no such thing as equal power for the people, only the rich get to vote.