Well actually if solosoyokaze had said something more like
"This is probably referring to the rothschilds based on (link to historical information). It's reasonable to extrapolate that they were war profiteers based on (reasoning)"
Then I think it really could have added some insight into the world instead of being like the drive-by ignorance the parent comment refers to.
The parent comment had no more sourcing than my comment, I'm not sure why you're singling my comment out. Yes the Rothschilds fit my description, but I'd argue anyone who maintained generational wealth in the time of colonization, slavery and zero labor laws, did so through non-ethical means.
"This is probably referring to the rothschilds based on (link to historical information). It's reasonable to extrapolate that they were war profiteers based on (reasoning)"
Then I think it really could have added some insight into the world instead of being like the drive-by ignorance the parent comment refers to.