If you said "Section 230 was designed to encourage websites to be neutral common carriers"
You are exactly 100% wrong. We've already covered why it does not require neutrality above, but it was also intended as the opposite of requiring websites to be "common carriers."
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200531/23325444617/hello...
If you said "Section 230 was designed to encourage websites to be neutral common carriers" You are exactly 100% wrong. We've already covered why it does not require neutrality above, but it was also intended as the opposite of requiring websites to be "common carriers."