A fair question generally. But also one that's not very relevant to this thread. There are already age restrictions on many activities anyway and proponents on both sides.
The point was that the parent poster was talking about a full ban on games and posted an example which did not support the assertion.
> The point was that the parent poster was talking about a full ban on games and posted an example which did not support the assertion.
It was basically a full ban on video games for anyone under 18. IIRC even games like Super Mario Bros. and PAC-MAN could have been banned for violence under the proposed standard.
The point was that the parent poster was talking about a full ban on games and posted an example which did not support the assertion.