Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Genuine question: what is smart about this? What is the reasoning for not just writing the static assets by hand?


The site already existed, but they wanted to serve it statically to save on complexity and money.

If you dig into the repo you'll see that it's maintained using a YAML file, which is a smart way to deal with small sites that still contain structured content.

I do the same thing for my https://github.com/simonw/museums site.


Some possibilities come to mind:

1. because the people writing the content are not developers. 2. there’s dynamic content, but when you know you’re going to get a large influx of traffic from a single region/event, you can precompute it for a short period.


It's smart because it's a solution to a problem (freezing dynamic content) in one line of code, the wget command. It should work for most cases and it's easy to understand and deploy.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: