Why do you need to disagree with BLM? The defunding the police stuff is impossible and stupid (though reform is necessary ASAP) but it’s clear to me, as a white guy, that 1. Black lives are worth protecting and 2. My life as a white guy will be better if black people were treated with dignity and respect at an institutional level. 3. BLM is the movement going forward from here so why not support it?
If you think that your life will be worse if the demands or whatever of BLM are met then you really need to be honest with yourself and others about who you are.
> The defunding the police stuff is impossible and stupid
> If you think that your life will be worse if the demands or whatever of BLM are met then you really need to be honest with yourself and others about who you are.
I mean, I'm anxious about all _impossible_ things making incursions on to this reality, but boy, you seem very favorable towards ideas you describe as stupid (I'm less convinced defunding is stupid, but abolishing police, that's not for me).
Defunding the police would create a power vacuum which could only be taken over by something worse. Yet the police are literally corrupt. Reform was already needed before the protests. Gradual, yes, but immediate action nonetheless. I’m not even American but it really seems like you guys are suffering under mismanagement. The police are a symptom of this. America needs to change.
For one thing I don't believe disrupting nuclear family model is a thing that will do any good, ironically especially for black families.
It is possible I am wrong, but as much as I informed myself, for this moment, my opinion is just different from the one proposed by BLM.
> If you think that your life will be worse if the demands or whatever of BLM are met then you really need to be honest with yourself and others about who you are.
And that is what I am talking about.
It seems to me that you think that all BLM demands are universally good - and if I don't fully agree with them I must be somehow a bad person.
I refuse to believe that they have monopoly for morality and truth.
If the nuclear family model were sustainable and prone to growth then how did we get here?
Middle-class is an important economic segment of the population but it really seems like protecting the middle class was always more important than growing the middle class.
Economics and statistics are hard and I’m forgiving for the protestors making some illogical demands which may feel right but would have unforeseen consequences. But there must be a compromise here. We all can’t just continue to pretend that things are great and BLM wants to disrupt that just cause.
I’m almost 40 and progress has been agonizingly slow. I argue that the counterpoints which I hear or read against BLM are really just good old fashioned conservatism masquerading as logical rigour.
If you think that your life will be worse if the demands or whatever of BLM are met then you really need to be honest with yourself and others about who you are.