Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
tempsy
on April 20, 2020
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Hundreds of thousands in L.A. may have been infect...
The huge difference is that the LA one claims to have tested a random sample of people while the Stanford one did not.
eightysixfour
on April 20, 2020
|
next
[–]
Some of the same authors, possible/likely they are using the same test.
longtimegoogler
on April 21, 2020
|
prev
|
next
[–]
That isn't huge. The biggest issue with the Stanford study was that they didn't take into account the Confidence Intervals of the Specificity.
tunesmith
on April 20, 2020
|
prev
[–]
Doesn't sound like that is a sufficient difference, however, if they also screwed up the stats and the analysis.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
