Please do not spread disinformation: Italy banned direct flights from China pretty quickly too.
It did not matter, because patient-0 in Europe was a German. Itβs now accepted that the virus arrived by crossing the Alps in some sort of Euro-business trip, not directly from China.
So banning international travel could have at least stopped it from reaching Germany. I think you are making his point while arguing on a technicality. I see no conceivable way that the economic loss of tourism or "business trips" is worse than what is about to go down in Europe.
The infection in Germany happened mid-January, when the Chinese had not even fully admitted to the problem. Chances are it had already reached all continents by the time any travel ban was even considered.
Unless you can read minds, these things happen very quickly now that the world is a global village.
> is worse than what is about to go down in Europe.
It's going down in the US too! We're merely a few days behind. If we had no cases, or a few contained clusters, then this would be an arguably useful policy. We have multiple uncontained outbreaks already, and have yet to enact meaningful policies to contain them.
It's too late. All this ban does is try to shift blame.
It did not matter, because patient-0 in Europe was a German. Itβs now accepted that the virus arrived by crossing the Alps in some sort of Euro-business trip, not directly from China.