Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm trying to convince my team to adopt a opt-in, voice only watercooler like that for some time, without success so far.

I makes a lot of sense to me, who have been doing this for over a decade with my friends.

Are you busy, don't join / mute yourself / go to the afk channel.

Are you waiting for a long build, just reading HN, between tasks? Join the channel and people can bond and talk about work/life.



So essentially a conference call that lasts all day, every day? I can see why your team did not approve.


I think that’s a gross oversimplification.

If you happen to check your replies I’m genuinely interested:

- do you work remote?

- if so, do you choose remote for solitude?

- if not- do you consider face to face interactions with your colleagues not as good a use of your time?

Again, genuinely interested because the full remote teams I’ve worked with that have voice comms at the ready have a lot less misunderstandings and the barrier to conversation is much lower than having to make a zoom / slack call.


I don't work remotely anymore. It's not that I think it's a bad idea. I think if a team isn't used to that level of communication, it makes for there to be some pushback.


Do you know a voice chat like this where I could get real-time information whether or not someone is there without having to join?

We use Hangouts and WhereBy (formerly appear.in) for some projects, but when you're in the "about to join" screen, the list of other people in the room isn't updated past initial load.


Yes, mumble has an API that can provide that info without having to join.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: