Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That isn't too costly to bear. There are already huge swathes of earth that are uninhabitable wastelands.

The change in evacuating a region is painful, but the length of time it stays evacuated isn't important. In the long term it is like the existence of the Sahara - just a fact.



Why nuclear industry cannot bear this burden then instead of tax payers?


Because the fossil fuel industries aren't bearing the burden of the cost of climate change (or geopolitical warfare) and that's what they have to be competitive with




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: