A bit unrelated, but I'm surprised because of how second readings are performed.
_In the UK, each mammogram is interpreted by two readers, and in cases of disagreement, an arbitration process may invoke a third opinion. These interpretations occur serially, such that each reader has access to the opinions of previous readers._
I wonder if it's sensible to condition the opinion of the second radiologist this way. My first impression is that this should be done blindly or the temptation of just confirming the previous reading because of fatigue/lazynes or to avoid confrontation could severely affect the results.
Similarly, a future in which the radiologist gets too much support could just impair their skills and turn them into a sort of a mechanical worker who simply accepts what the AI overlord has decided.
_In the UK, each mammogram is interpreted by two readers, and in cases of disagreement, an arbitration process may invoke a third opinion. These interpretations occur serially, such that each reader has access to the opinions of previous readers._
I wonder if it's sensible to condition the opinion of the second radiologist this way. My first impression is that this should be done blindly or the temptation of just confirming the previous reading because of fatigue/lazynes or to avoid confrontation could severely affect the results.
Similarly, a future in which the radiologist gets too much support could just impair their skills and turn them into a sort of a mechanical worker who simply accepts what the AI overlord has decided.