Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The text says 24-60 hours, but then in the table where they talk about the other studies being considered, a lot of them did 48 hour minimum and as much as 96 hours for some. When I saw the headline I was excited because a 16-18 hour fast really isn't very hard for most people, but 48 hours sounds a little rough. I guess if it's just a one-off event while you're doing chemo it's not that bad, but I'm not about to fast 48 hours once a week for the rest of my life.


>but I'm not about to fast 48 hours once a week for the rest of my life

Why not? I mean why reject it a priori?

Who said it will be difficult after the first few months? And what if it has beneficial properties?


Most people have trouble even taking a pill regularly. And that's painless. Regularly self-inflicting pain like hunger for 40+ hours at a time has absolutely no hope of becoming a standard therapy in medicine. The percentage of patient compliance would be in the single digits.


I don't even know how people fast for that long. I start getting head-aches and feel awful long before that. So just deciding to fast for 48 hours/week seems untenable to me.


>I start getting head-aches and feel awful long before that.

Well, people often also get cramps when they first start working out. After keeping at it though...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: