Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can anyone now blast Apple on anti-trust grounds, for banning competing browsers in their store?

When Apple want to sabotage universal adoption of certain technology (such as DASH for video streaming), they can avoid implementing needed components on the client side in their engine, forcing everyone who wants to target iOS (a sizable chunk of the Web market) to support their own technology instead of only something else.

So control over the browser engines in the store gives them anti-competitive control which extends way beyond it. It's surprising no one challenged that garbage until now.



On the one hand I dislike that Safari has a monopoly in iOS, but I fear the alternative is a de-facto monopoly for Chrome, which could be even worse.


Firefox could be released for iOS if not for this ban.


And so would Chrome which would, realistically, be far more popular.


What happened to Firefox?


It looses everywhere it competes with Chrome... much as I hate to say it.


It doesn't matter if it can't be even released there. That's the whole point. Apple don't compete on merit, they use monopolistic tactics to ban competition.


When Google puts Chrome banners on google.com, and in gmail popups, is that "competing on merit?" How can I run some ads on google.com?


This is indeed the elephant in the room. All app developers, except spotify, are too terrified to directly confront with Apple. That's the chilling effect of a true monopoly.


Kinda like Google and their widevine DRM only being available on Chrome and first party apps. If you want to watch Google Play purchases you MUST use their clients. Is this monopolistic or are we still gonna ignore all the crap Google does?


Yeah Apple can do that. Thank goodness. Safari lags on web standards. It's ahead on anti-tracking, Reader Mode, etc. Which focus benefits the user more?


They do that. However it shouldn't be legal in any sane legal climate, where competition law is not a fake facade. And who would defend the monopoly except for shills?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: