Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Deep fakes lack context. There are no witnesses, etc. So they’ll be most “effective” in trying to establish something in the past. It’ll be harder to produce the context where it’s believable in the near past (present minus up to a day a month a year?). So they may be useful in sowing distrust in someone by establishing they did something untoward in the past, but less likely to incite immediate reaction about something happening now, or recent past, once people become used to the possibility.


Presumably you'd fake things it would be plausible the politician was trying to keep secret. So you'd expect there to be no witnesses.

For example you'd fake hidden camera footage of politicians beating prostitutes and accepting brown envelopes from russian agents.


People will "remember" things that didn't happen.


People already remember things that didn't happen; and public figures already get maligned by news outlets lying about what they did and where they went. Even when the situations are revealed to be lies.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: