I don't think I'd call the transputer "hardware multitasking" so much as "integrated communications network."
For a time the T800 was the top of the FP pile. Not for long, though, and then the long, long, long wait for the disappointing T9k doomed the whole architecture.
>I don't think I'd call the transputer "hardware multitasking"
"A Transputer had a number of simple operating system functions built into the hardware. These included hardware multitasking with foreground and background priority levels, hardware timers, and hardware time-slicing of background tasks."
There are special instruction to start and end a process, and the fact that it was a stack machine means context switches were extremely fast, almost no registers to save/restore.
> so much as "integrated communications network."
It had both, and both were integrated. IIRC, the instructions to send/receive on the links were integrated with the multitasking hardware.
"The first 16 'secondary' zero-operand instructions (using the OPR primary instruction) were:
Mnemonic Description
REV Reverse – swap two top items of register stack
LB Load byte
BSUB Byte subscript
ENDP End process
DIFF Difference
ADD Add
GCALL General Call – swap top of stack and instruction pointer
IN Input – receive message
PROD Product
GT Greater Than – the only comparison instruction
WSUB Word subscript
OUT Output – send message
SUB Subtract
STARTP Start process
OUTBYTE Output byte – send one-byte message
OUTWORD Output word – send one-word message"
Also, you could designate memory locations as local communications channels, and the same instructions would work. So the same binary could run locally or distributed.
For a time the T800 was the top of the FP pile. Not for long, though, and then the long, long, long wait for the disappointing T9k doomed the whole architecture.