Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think it's kinda like Google working with Android as an open source project. Google makes money on Android primarily by using Android as a means of delivering the Google ecosystem. They don't care that it's open source because they don't make money by selling it.

Apple could do the same thing with maps. Support a robust open mapping initiative to make sure their primary business (selling iPhones and other devices) has a solid platform for emerging technologies like AR. Making sure they have a solid maps offering supports the Apple (aka iPhone) ecosystem.

Also similarly to Google, they can still push plenty of proprietary things on top of the open parts of the initiative.



Plus it seems like this would weaken Google's partial stranglehold on the market is a side effect.


Commoditize your complement.


I like that line, is it yours or does it have some further history/examples behind it?


It's been around for a while. Here it is talked about by Joel Spolsky in 2002: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/

Gwern's article about it was recently discussed here on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17047348


This is a great idea. I hope someone at Apple is reading.

Makes perfect sense, they don't need to make money on it, just an alternative to google.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: