> Ad reinsertion solutions exist for Chrome, but they also dont support Firefox.
"Ad reinsertion". You're trying to bypass the user's self-determination on the web. Good luck, bozo.
> They are even going to approach google and ask them to introduce new API's that allow us to determine if browser really chrome or just chromium, so that we block chromium.
And now we see the real question: "Is there some way to lock our users into browsers that give more control to us than the users?"
By "Ad reinsertion", they mean the paid advertisement inclusion programmes of Adblock and Adblock Plus, which is opt-out and pretty shady in the first place.
They think that Adblock and Adblock Plus don't exist on Firefox, and that people who use uBlock Origin on Firefox will not use uBlock Origin on Chrome too if they were somehow forced to use Chrome.
No, they are talking about services such as Instart. Javascript that runs on the page, detects the advertisements are being blocked, does a redirect through Instart's proxy to insert hard coded advertisements, and redirects back. Instart only works on Chrome.
"Ad reinsertion". You're trying to bypass the user's self-determination on the web. Good luck, bozo.
> They are even going to approach google and ask them to introduce new API's that allow us to determine if browser really chrome or just chromium, so that we block chromium.
And now we see the real question: "Is there some way to lock our users into browsers that give more control to us than the users?"