Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Same as A1GP - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A1_Grand_Prix#Chassis_and_engi...

> This regulation provided a level playing field in which driver skill and team effort should become the primary factor for success.

Compared with F1 now where some teams can (effectively) "pay to win".



To be fair, the F1 teams pay to win by paying for some stunning engineering. The way the F1 rules are set up means that F1 is basically an engineering contest first and a racing series second. It's part of the reason that it is so great to watch.

.. and I say this as a McLaren fan (which, for those that don't follow F1, is a traditionally top F1 team that has had an absolutely woeful couple of years).


True. For example, Force India, one of the teams with the least amount of funding of all of them on circuit. They are competing way above their way class, in terms of money, and doing very well. It's actually pretty amazing how often they are in the points (top 10 race finish) for the resources they have. Talk about amazing engineering and process they must use to compete against Ferrari/Mercedes/Red bull.


Yep - one of the things Eddie Jordan did right, setting the environment up to really optimise for one condition (top speed). When you have limited resources, focus on the most important thing and then make up for other shortcomings with talent.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: