You must be responding to the current HN title and not anything from the actual paper? This comment doesn't make any sense otherwise.
The paper literally has an entire section titled "All unicorns are overvalued" (section 4.2) and figure 3 shows the distribution of overvaluations given their methodology.
You must be responding to the current HN title and not anything from the actual paper? This comment doesn't make any sense otherwise.
The paper literally has an entire section titled "All unicorns are overvalued" (section 4.2) and figure 3 shows the distribution of overvaluations given their methodology.