Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Reducing Bezos' intellect to a banality like "drive and intelligence" tosses out a lot of fascinating particulars.


i didn't reduce anything, there is nothing unfounded (i used this because you said canard but then changed it to banality) about applying "drive and intelligence" to bezos, and yegge didn't present any particulars to even throw out. i am sure there are a lot of interesting particulars about bezos, but yegge's article didn't present any. do you have any you'd like to share?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: