Haven't actually added location search yet. Thats next. Its also really difficult to determine the location because I'm working with limited data. The idea was to use the headquarter data, especially since most startups don't have multiple locations.
I will add the "discovery" date to give a bit better idea of when things were found. But my crawler removes jobs that are no longer listed, so the results should always be fresh within a day.
"Discovery" date is very useful for filtering out generic job postings that HR sometimes keeps up just to collect the resumes. Not sure if this is at all legal in the US, but in Canada this is a very common practice.
With regards to the location uncertainty - better not show anything in this case. Until you said "headquarters" I didn't even bother to look at the name of the column and assumed it was the location of the actual position.
Also the information on your site is not meant for pleasure reading, it is meant for scanning. As such the list needs to be much more compact. I'd take the logotypes out, reduce the line-height as well as the width of the table.
I will add the "discovery" date to give a bit better idea of when things were found. But my crawler removes jobs that are no longer listed, so the results should always be fresh within a day.
Thanks for the feedback!