What? No, I don't understand what he said. It was a list of dates and events that I don't know are true or accurate, without any context of why he commented them. I was referring to you when I said
>Claim dishonesty when claims are not accepted on face value
I made no claim that I wish you accepted at face value. So as far as i understand, you must be referring to bills claim. Otherwise, to which claim are you referring?
Assuming it is bills claim to ehich you refer, if you don't understand the context, how can it be a claim?
>Claim dishonesty when claims are not accepted on face value