Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Now why would you do that?

If you agree with the need for a search then you could say why, maybe there is a use case that is good enough for Paul to cross that line and make it happen, this is not a popularity contest, it simply gets me that such a basic and much needed feature is missing and I feel that if Paul practices what he preaches that he should have implemented it long ago.

HN is not a democracy, the 'shall we put it to a vote' was an attempt at showing how many people really do want this, if Paul does not wish to know or if he would ignore the outcome anyway that's his right, but it would be nice to see some consistency in the reasoning about why there is no search.



I guess I thought you really wanted a vote. It just seemed like the simplest way to hack it.

It seems pointless to say why: the reasons are obvious, and stating them is not getting you anywhere. Why is a whole bunch of people showing that they want search not a compelling 'why'? Even if popularity contests aren't the best decision, the results of a vote in a small community seems like a reasonable signal to want.

'Why would I do that?' Jeez, why does downvoting cause such a kneejerk reaction? Even if karma means something - which it does not! - PG has plenty of it if anybody does.

I was just trying to help you. I wasn't really thinking about search before you posted, and now I'll go back to doing that. Whatever..

Update: deleted baiting to downvote which is apparently also bad form according to the guidelines.


A vote would have been fine with me, but PG is well within his rights as the owner of the site to ignore the outcome.

To ask people to downvote or upvote others is really bad form here.


Course he'll ignore it. You think I wasn't aware of that?

"To ask people to downvote or upvote others is really bad form here."

Apparently. I can't argue with that. Thanks for the tip.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: