I'm not at all worried about "fake" news becoming such a problem that it substantially distorts the public's perception of reality. That might have been an issue 100 years ago when information traveled slowly, but with the speed of communication and the ease of fact checking today any blatantly false news is pretty quickly snuffed out (and the reporter's reputation so damaged that they quickly become irrelevant).
Much more of a threat is a MSM (which is highly coordinated and have a mutual interest in maintaining their control) branding independent sources as "fake"
On the other side, see http://www.snopes.com/1998-trump-people-quote/ for a debunk of a widely shared statement that Trump purportedly made in 1998 about how he'd run as a Republican because Republican voters are so dumb.
Try this exercise. Every news story that you see on social media for a day, try to fact check it. Try to track down an authoritative source. I predict that you'll be shocked at how much stuff we hear that just ain't so.
That would be more correctly termed as a conspiracy theory, which have existed forever. Has Breitbart or any other major independent news source covered this?
> I'm not at all worried about "fake" news becoming such a problem that it substantially distorts the public's perception of reality.
> Much more of a threat is a MSM (which is highly coordinated and have a mutual interest in maintaining their control) branding independent sources as "fake"
Much more of a threat is a MSM (which is highly coordinated and have a mutual interest in maintaining their control) branding independent sources as "fake"