Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This thread went from 2nd most voted to killed immediately. dang, what can you tell us about this? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12651429 (you need showdead=yes in your profile to see it)


Seems pretty obvious to me: a combination of (1) gratuitously political and (2) gratuitously hysterical. ("Progressive-supremacist"? Really?)


It's only moral supremacy, not sure that counts.


HackerNews has started to feel a bit like Twitter lately.


They love it when eyeballs write content for free.

They hate it when it isn't exactly what they'd have written themselves.


The votes were going up and down pretty quickly and hard, HN has a well-established policy of killing controversial threads and submissions.

I don't blame the mods for killing it, and nobody should jump to conclusions or accuse censorship. I think it's perfectly understandable.


We don't kill comments except when banning users (and in nearly all cases we'll say that we're doing so), and have well-established policy of not doing that. When a comment is dead and says [flagged], it means that users flagged it.


Saying a well-liked company should fail does not go well around here, especially when they make wild, conspiracy-like accusations with absolutely no supporting evidence.


Twitter chose this long list of liberal-leaning associations to "police" the community. I don't think it's a conspiracy-like accusation to say their moderation leans to the left. https://blog.twitter.com/2016/announcing-the-twitter-trust-s...


Except that:

1. Those organizations aren't there to "police" the community. Here are Twitter's actual words about what they're meant to do:

"The Twitter Trust and Safety Council provides input on our safety products, policies, and programs."

Notably not listed there: having any direct power over the Twitter community.

2. The reason why Twitter introduced this thing is that they were getting a lot of flack from people and groups who "lean to the left", for allegedly being a cesspool of the sort of abuse that people and groups who "lean to the left" get most upset about, and not doing anything about it.

I don't know whether those accusations were 100% wrong, 100% right, or somewhere in between. But when a company is attacked for doing or allowing something allegedly bad, it's hardly a surprise if the people it gets onside to try to show it's addressing the problem are the sort of people who most disapprove of whatever it was.


The headline is flat out wrong, TWTR is the highest price it has been in a year




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: