> What changed that makes you think that? R6RS > As for Clojure not having Lisp ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		_19qg on Aug 26, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Dinosaur and Lisp > What changed that makes you think that? R6RS > As for Clojure not having Lisp lists, its list implementation is... eccentric, but it DOES have lists. Lazy persistent sequences is the basic abstraction.

qwertyuiop924 on Aug 26, 2016 [–]

Uggghh. R6RS was an absolute mess. But I'd still say it was a lisp.

Have you looked at R7RS, the latest spec, that goes back to the drawing board on a lot of the stuff R6RS did?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact