Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, the other way around. They were all set to get it in at a high level into the military, when some pesky medical lower ranking officer said, hey, doesn't this need FDA approval? Theranos tried to squelch that, but to no avail.


Is it possible both of you are right?


> Is it possible both of [them] are right?

Absolutely. However, they give 0 attribution to their baseless assertions. I follow Theranos enough where neither of these statements are so obviously common knowledge that they don't need to reference something at least in passing.

Mostly, I am curious how this ended up happening.


Attribution: http://www.fiercemedicaldevices.com/story/theranos-asked-mil...

"But things didn't shake out that way. A military regulatory expert contacted the FDA with concerns about Theranos' technology without telling the company first, stalling the project and prompting Holmes to reach out to Mattis for help.

"I would very much appreciate your help in getting this information corrected with the regulatory agencies," Holmes wrote in an email to Mattis, saying that since the "misinformation came from within DOD, it would be "invaluable" to have the information "formally corrected by the right people in the DOD."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: