But wasn’t the argument of the wasm team against the LISP features that binary s... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		kuschku on March 12, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Call for support for Lisp in WebAssembly developme... But wasn’t the argument of the wasm team against the LISP features that binary size isn’t relevant and just a "nice to have" feature?

dietrichepp on March 14, 2016 [–]

I don't think anyone is arguing that binary size isn't relevant. It just has to be weighed against the other parameters we want to optimize, like implementation complexity.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact