Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As it stands, the state, universities and other providers might have sponsored a lot of the infrastructure, while fb is just using it, so if they want their own, they should build it and only offer fb. for free.


If the state thinks it's a bad idea, they can not offer their own infrastructure to FB. That's not what happened. They decreed that nobody, even those who agree with FB, can rent their infrastructure to FB. That's the problem.


The state cannot not offer it's infrastructure to the private providers that are connected to the internet,

As you say, It's a problem, alright, but not actually mine, so I wont go anymore into this.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: