That's because it's rotationally insensitive, which is a rather interesting prop... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		regularfry on Sept 20, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: $1 Unistroke Recognizer That's because it's rotationally insensitive, which is a rather interesting property. I'm not sure how useful it is, but it certainly surprised me.

mmusson on Sept 20, 2015 [–]

When I used this code for a simple application, I made a small change to the recognized to limit the rotational invariance so that a gesture that was rotated more than a certain angle threshold would not match.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact