So I'm repeating what somebody said rather than my own claim, but I think it was... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		AnimalMuppet on Aug 27, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: OCamlers' critiques of Haskell So I'm repeating what somebody said rather than my own claim, but I think it was that Haskell monads didn't have to be... one of left- or right-associative. But they had to be the other. Wish I knew of a good way to search HN; it was in a comment here maybe 6 months or a year ago...

tome on Aug 27, 2015 [–]

> Haskell monads didn't have to be... one of left- or right-associative. But they had to be the other.

That's very puzzling. I wish I knew what you were referring to!

AnimalMuppet on Aug 28, 2015 | [–]

Hah! Found it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7770129

That was my source (I was the parent). Unfortunately, it doesn't quite answer your question...

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact