Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | yc-kraln's commentslogin

I came here to post this. We make a lot of the same sorts of optimizations for our OS distro (debian based) -- disabling frequency scaling, core pinning, etc. Critically, CPU0 has a bunch of stuff you cannot push, and you're better off with using one of the other cores as an isolated island.

This is what the scheduler latency looks like on our isolated core:

# Total: 000300000 # Min Latencies: 00001 # Avg Latencies: 00005 # Max Latencies: 00059 # Histogram Overflows: 00000

(those are uS!)


Very cool. What are you running on it? What's your use case?


My big issue with this study is it points to a cause. How can they know the issue is social media, and not, say, the climbing atmospheric CO2 or other long-COVID related issues?


The root cause is likely to the surge of dopamine in the brain related to activities like scrolling social media, fast-paced tik-tok videos, porn, etc. This means that the brain is so much addicted to this dopamine that normal level are no longer enough to be functional.


Please see my post above about dopamine and memory. The low dopamine effects memory as well as concentration.

See:

Novelty and Dopaminergic Modulation of Memory Persistence: A Tale of Two Systems

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6352318/


There can be many causes. Aside from social media, games, porn and AI, it can also be caused by the decline of the living standards or increase of stress in the West due to shift from social-democratic to neoliberal economic policies.


Study does not point at causes. The blog post does. A blog post inspired by a study and study itself are two different things.


Got one of these as well, a powershell one which had a whole complex rootkit in it that bypasses the built-in virus detection. Super nasty!


Sounds like you want Molly


For anyone else that's not familiar, this is referring to https://molly.im/ which looks like it's a fork of Signal. And looks like it interops with Signal, so you can talk to your regular Signal contacts as well.

That's very interesting.

My only concern with it would be how sustainable it is in the long term. I am using Threema currently, which has a plan for enterprises, so that seems more reliable but it's lacking in features and usability.


> My only concern with it would be how sustainable it is in the long term.

Another concern should be: can you trust molly? Cryptographers have been auditing Signal... who is auditing molly?


In addition, it looks like third-party apps (there are a few) that interface with the official Signal client maybe against Signal's TOS. They haven't enforced it yet from what I can see but it's a possibility and that's a fairy large risk IMO.


The stepping didn't kill wifi, the boards they ran with the d0 stepping have likely a different wifi chip (it's connected externally) or similar (maybe the wifi chip has a different stepping?), unrelated board-level changes.

The d0 stepping boards I have with wifi work with the linux kernel, still.


Interesting, going through the comments…

“WiFi is still via SDIO on the Broadcom chip, IIRC.”

<https://www.jeffgeerling.com/comment/34061#comment-34061>

And

“Ran a quick search on Raspberry Pi's github linux repo and found where I got my info from re the stuff they took out on D0. From what I can see, they actually removed device tree support for parts of the chip they don't use on C0/C1 that are not present on D0, and folded these changes into the same DTS file. They also seem to have added a DTS specifically for the D0 stepping, which seems to be register changes, i.e. stuff that is present in both variants of the chip but has moved or needs to otherwise be handled differently between C1 and D0. See https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/pull/5847, specifically for the bits removed see <https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/pull/5847/commits/8be08...>“

<https://www.jeffgeerling.com/comment/34061#comment-34061>

Something broke. Without going through the obsd code it remains unknown. Unless there is reference to uart3 & uart4?


I get this issue when it uses sudo to run a process with root privileges, and then times out.


I work with Claude more-or-less how I worked with our Indian colleagues; the difference is Claude is improving over time.


For me this is a space that has been long dominated by MRPeasy--it's just such a perfect fit. Happy to see open source solutions slowly catching up.


Definitely had fun as I was scrolling the article with a Trackpoint using the scrolling button. 100% my preferred way to laptop.


I have a somewhat different problem with io_uring in practice: It's extremely hard to use /correctly/. The management of buffers which bounce across a kernel boundary and may-or-may-not end up in the same original thread lends itself to lots of subtle race conditions, resource exhaustions, and ABA issues. It's not that you can't make it work, and work well--it's that it's hard to do correctly, and very easy to make something which works 99.99% correctly, and then fails spectacularly under load or over time.

I can imagine the security implications are the same.


> and may-or-may-not end up in the same original thread

That sounds like a problem stemming entirely from a decision to share a ring among multiple application threads. Is there a good reason to do so? Each thread that needs to do IO can have its own ring, and submitting IO to another thread's ring seems like unnecessary complexity. The ring buffers are intended to be single-producer, single-consumer.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: