Weightlifters use weight they can lift and feel good after the session. Literally. They may feel tired, but they feel good. They see weights go up and feel like progressing (unless they are in fact stagnating).

That is literal opposite of what OP describes. What OP describes is weight lifter taking on weight they cant lift and conatantly feeling like a failure after each training.

Frankly, they are not at all good at that. At least for me, they just failed. Thr fact is, they have no idea about when I am about to forget this or that fact.

Except that is bullshit. They did worked the other parts of the year too, just not doing the exact same agricultural work as those few weeks.

That thing simply ignores everything it takes to keep animals alive year round, keep kids alive year round, create and repair tools, keep house warm, create fabric, sew cloth, actually cook without modern tools and so on and so forth.

Just because there is a rush time does not mean workers do nothing the rest od the time.

Average person took long time off work to travel to visit far away friends? Call me sceptical, because this is provably untrue for pretty much any period and place we have actual resources about.

No, because it existed when economy was good too. It has nothing to do with economy state.

It is more of moral judgement thing, completely divorced from both needs and outcomes.

Yeah. And the same people seem puzzled when they see random citizens hating on AI with passion and treating it as a threat.

> And all the powers SCOTUS gave the executive branch will eventually be in the hands of the Loyal Opposition.

They will find excuses to reverse. There will be some technicality, made up historical precense or some actually untrue fact about the world that wil totally make the situation different.

Conservative heretage foundation group has outcome in mind ... and "opposition" is not their preffered outcome.

The downvoters assume that it is a bad faith question. The downvoters are 99% right with that. If the 1% hit then OP is just exceedingly naive and did not followed the scandal in which case they should maybe first do some reading.

The names of involved powerful people were NOT supposed to be censored. All those names except Bill Clinton name were redacted. To protect Trump and everybody else involved in the scandal except said Bill Clinton. But especially to protect Trump.

They also obscured the male perpetrators faces and bodies in many images, illegaly.

I assume that de facto federal "law" now makes it illegal to be raped, and those men are the victims. That would be a logical conclusion of edgelord vice signalling, right?

I know what all of these words mean, but not when they're in this order.

The school did not even tried. They just assumed the girl lied. When they found out the bullying was true and that girl tried to report it ... they still expelled the girl and let boys be.

The school had better options available.

I will go out and say that the school simply played out traditional believes. First, punishing victim to striking back or defending himself/herself is easier, victim should not make noise. And second, boys matter more, it is normal boyhood for them to bully girls who are reaching above their station if they defend themselves.

The first belief is non gendered, applies to any victim.

Basically, the school was protecting the bullies and took issue with the victim not being submissive toward the bullies. The victim took all correct steps until there were no more correct steps. The school continued to protect bullies and sent the message that victims must stay docile.

The cops made different decision. It might have been better for everyone, including the perpetrators, if the school focused on raising the boys not be bullies rather then focusing on enabling them.