Location: India
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Yes
Technologies: Rust, Python, Docker, Linux, Terraform, K8s, Sandboxes
Résumé/CV: vrn21.com/resume
Email: hello@vrn21.com
I'm KV, upcoming grad, previously interned at 3 startups [1x YC], where most of my work has revolved around Systems [Rust, Python, Docker, Linux]; You could see more info at my resume: [vrn21.com/resume]
from a utilitarian perspective, can we swap this instead of a e2b or some other provider? since this doesnt require n number of micrvovm kernals and rootfs hanging round?
Exactly, that’d be the intention. For compute-heavy or long running jobs you’d still probably want a dedicated VM like on E2B but for quick stuff, bVisor
Location: India
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Yes to anywhere (if provided with VISA)
Technologies: Rust, Python, Docker, Terraform, Linux, Infra/Systems/Backend
Résumé/CV: vrn21.com/resume
Email: hello [at] vrn21 [dot] com
upcoming grad with 3 prior internships [1x yc]: rl envs, linux, filesystems. recently built a sandbox for agents with rust and firecracker as well btw: github.com/vrn21/bouvet
my ideal scenario is a cloud web model getting access to a sandbox to run commands and read/write to files. but yeah it could be used as an alternative to bash and read write tools.
I did not get your second question exactly, but yeah microvms can be considered one of the secure ways to run your agent
Basically, just thinking that it’s more ideal to have the tool call the micro VM versus the agent, doing it in the sense of its mandated by the tool call