Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | verg's commentslogin

Detroit is the birthplace of Techno and Techno artists have continued to emerge from Detroit even as it's status as a city has declined. Because of this the city is idealized among Techno fans across Europe. My guess is some of this development is trying to target this European base.


Detroit has sizable Russian and Polish populations


eh. But also filters people who are serious about work but also serious about their mental health.

I know myself well enough to know that I am less productive when I don't get sunlight. I suspect many other people are the same.


The results of Seattle area companies beg to differ. I live in Seattle and I find that if I walk outdoors during the day at least once per day, I'm fine.


What does mental health of people living there have to do with the success of a few companies?

There are successful companies that eat their workers alive, employee happiness isn't related with their success in a lot of cases.


Tech companies can only produce what their employees output. If people were so miserable in Seattle there's no way that any company based there would thrive enough to be a top company in the world.


I used to live in Seattle and that was a major contributing factor that caused me to move to Atlanta.


Since many people on HN live in California. The single greatest thing you can do if you live in be an advocate for building more housing in California, especially in locations with public transportation. California has low heating and cooling costs, and existing public transportation networks that can be extended.

Look at the difference in per capita carbon emissions between California and say, Texas, a place where many Californian's are moving to because of high housing costs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_carbon_...


I wonder how much the difference in residential heating/cooling really matters.

For example, I looked at natural gas consumption, in Texas industrial use is off the charts, residential is reasonably in line with California (on a per capita basis).

https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/data.php?incfile=/state/seds/...

Of course that is only enough to say that it is necessary to take a closer look, by the time everything is added up it could well be that living in California is substantially better.


The name for this is crony capitalism. Policy that benefits businesses instead of policy that benefits markets. Luigi Zingales's book "A Capitalism for the People" is a good read on the subject.


Nah, there are lots of ways to get that unfair advantage. Network effects are a big one. Facebook is only facebook because everybody is on it. MS Office is only MS Office because everybody has it.

Are they superior products? Meh.

Would you particularly miss them if they were destroyed? Unlikely. Somebody just as good would come along by and by, or one of the other ones would rise to replace them.

Are you gonna pay for them anyways? Bet your ass you will.


>Why Socialism for the Rich, Capitalism for the Poor?

A simple, if specious answer: The Golden rule - she who has the gold, makes the rules.


An examination of all current and historical implementations of capitalism quickly leads to the conclusion that all capitalism eventually becomes "crony capitalism", and playing the "no true scotsman" game with regards to capitalism does not demonstrate anything meaningful.


He`s not talking about policy. Most capitalistic businesses are anti-competitive regardless of policy.


That is patently ridiculous. The vast majority of firms that you give your dollars too have direct competitors. They may not prefer to have competitors, but neither do you when applying for jobs or bidding on a house, that is pretty basic human nature.


Wait, so you say 'that is patently ridiculous', then completely agree with me while trying to add your own little spin on it? Okay bud.


They have what is generally considered an unfair advantage though.

Typically at least effects of scale and cartel-like contracts with other major players.


If only there were some technology that would allow multiple homes to exist on a single lot...


That would just be priced into the lot.

People are going to spend 35-50% of their incomes on housing.


Federal mortgage regulations are strongly biased against that. And in the USA the Federal gov't. owns the mortgage industry.


The lack of on-street parking was something I noticed visiting Japan. Streets can be much smaller when they don't have 20-24 feet of parking. In the US, a massive percentage of our most valuable land goes to subsidized vehicle storage. It's insane.


Narrower streets, wider sidewalks, more trees.


Actually most minor streets in Tokyo have no sidewalk. You can just walk on the street.

Cars drive through slowly, of course.


German suburb showing the example: http://i.imgur.com/DHhjSQ8.jpg


This is a good interview with economist Gordon Hanson on trade, poverty and US job losses: http://www.vox.com/2016/4/20/11466868/trade-poverty-economis...


His book, Triumph of the City, is a good read on urban economics.


I really love using Car2Go in Brooklyn. I transit/Bike/Walk 95% of the time, but it's great to have a one-way option when I take a trip that doesn't line up well transit lines.


interesting fact about car2go: car2go is no longer active in Ulm(Germany) which was the first pilot project


Yuma Az was just successfully sued for zoning laws under the fair housing act. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2016/04/court-decision-on-dis...

Another group is trying to sue Lafayette, Ca http://www.citylab.com/housing/2015/09/suing-the-suburbs-ove...

Edit: fixed first link


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: