Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | unsubstantiated's commentslogin

people bullshit at programming and don't treat it like a genuine craft all the time


They mean they want you to re-read their sentence in a posh english accent


Always has been. It's a distractionary boogeyman.


I'm surprised one of the options isn't "pro-them killing eachother off" because that seems like the best of the bunch.


That would be in incredibly poor taste while their colleagues/contributors are being held hostage


The way ChatGPT4 phrases an answer for this sort of a question absolves it of smug pretentiousness that is common to HN.

Whether or not its a correct answer, however...


lol


cringe larp


None, another internet, drivel-fueled LARP.


Running away from the problem will only make it worse.


Implying "instead of path B, which is good for your child, do path A, which is bad for your child, to prevent A from becoming an even worse option?"


“Sacrifice your child for the greater good of society!”


Will it though? The pilgrims ran away from Britain with unashamed success. Running away turned them from oppressed minority group to the founding members of the richest, most prosperous, strongest society on the face of the earth


>I deeply believe everyone is virtuous, as they personally define it. For the most part, I believe the world’s virtues are common. We all want peace, joy, safety, and comfort. We all want to smile.

Well I don't. And this belief isn't any more valid or invalid than mine, or anyone else's. Regardless of the flimsy definition of virtuousness, there are people out there who are hellbent on causing harm, and some are petty killers who are caught easily for tormenting and murdering their own little children, while others are in positions of serious power and leverage over nations who start wars and worse. Are there good people? Yes. Is everyone after peace, joy, safety and comfort? No Master Wayne, some people just want to watch the world burn.

The people in charge of Social Media aren't good people.


It’s almost a weakly stated version of the ancient philosophical discussion about desiring the good (where good is basically “that which is desired” and evil “that which is not desired”) - it needs much more development to become a useful discussion.

And it becomes even more vague on a societal size - if I had a button that when pressed would take one dollar from everyone in the USA and give it to me, would I press the button? $350 million versus large amounts of people only out a dollar …


What makes you think "the people in charge of social media"* aren't good people?

(* Is this just at the CEO level, so a handful of people? Or like, their immediate underlings, so a few dozens of people? Or middle management, so hundreds? Are they all not good people?)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: