On the contrary, PG encourages open criticism. It's a good way for YC to improve.
We had a great experience with no regrets. Apply now if you're on the fence. Having said that, my criticism is that, like any startup, YC has some growing pains while it scales.
In particular, our experience (S2010, 36 companies) wasn't as intimate as I had hoped it would be. But they're working to address that, which was a learning experience in itself. You get to see how smart people try to scale an operation while preserving what makes it special.
Relatedly, I also didn't expect YC to feel internally competitive at times. Resources can become limited, from the basics like seating and food, to the important stuff like the time and attention of speakers, investors, and PG himself. With that many companies, there's also inevitably some overlap among product ideas.
However, overall it was much more cooperative than competitive, and I welcomed a little friendly competition. The resulting "coopetition" is a balance I think they'll need to watch as they scale.
Completely the opposite. I've been on HN for several years and am currently applying to YC with a cofounder. Having had the pleasure of meeting pg this past weekend I would say that both he and YC are very open to legitimate criticisms when they arise. YC is all about helping startups to succeed, because if they do then so does YC.
Mental tenacity — and the ability to manage and even
thrive on and push through pain — is a key segregator
between the mortals and immortals
- Mary Wittenberg
Likewise most job ads provide very little actual information about the job, use vague descriptions for everything, do not explain what company or project the job is really for, cannot explain what actual skills are required to do the job, do not give any idea what pay-scale is being offered.
Bingo. If job positions advertised themselves with clear examples of projects I'd be expected to tackle within my first year on the job, I'd be a lot more likely to consider switching.
