Selling it is one thing. Making it a subscription is just crazy to me.

Isn't making it a subscription more honest? Don't pay an outright price for this, just pay monthly until it stops working

It probably will require constant support to keep filtration working. These big companies don’t like content cutters at all.

If it's providing value to the user month to month then it makes sense to be a subscription. Lifetime license are racing to the bottom for ongoing value.

Pretty rude remark. And what makes you think that ASI is _just on the horizon_?

Okay I'm building this.

Thank you so much.

I wouldn't call it luxury. It's just that people don't find it attractive while living in Seoul. Average joe definitely can afford having a car.

"An advanced city is not one where even the poor use cars, but rather one where even the rich use public transport."

I have minor inconveniences and hiccups with Linux.

I have a gut-level disdain for and distrust of Windows.

Well, yes. That's literally what it is.

What what is? The article has nothing to do with LLMs. It even explicitly says they don’t use LLMs.

> Is a LLM logic in weights derived from machine learning?

I was just answering this question. LLM logic in weights is fundamentally from machine learning, so yes. Wasn't really saying anything about the article.

Forgejo, even. Both awesome, truly capable Github alternatives.