Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | shepting's commentslogin

I was working there that fall as one of my co-op work terms!

I recall the onboarding tour around the testing rooms which were essentially giant Faraday cages. There was a print-out on the door exhorting employees to CLOSE THE DOOR! when you come or go. Apparently it was a semi-monthly occurrence where someone would accidentally leave the door propped open and the nightly tests on upcoming devices would make real 911 calls to the local dispatchers as the E2E tests on physical hardware were running.


I'm guessing that using some clip-on aero bars would make a big difference. Then you're not using your hands to support any weight so the typing would be a little easier.

And if you're doing hours of Z2 training, you likely want to be getting more time in a position closer to what you'd be doing in the drops.


Do you happen to have a link to the talk about Nix on macOS you heard about it from? Or event the title/details so I could search?


here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73mnPBLL_20

be warned, it's from 2017, so there are 5 years of history you'll still need to go looking for



I used to work at a company in the chip-design software space that built Linux-only software for $100k/user/year, so there's definitely money to be made for Linux (even if it happens to be niche software).


This is the comment I came here for.

I had a professor in college who was building self-driving tractors and would come in every other week complaining about John Deere this, or Case that, trying to steal his business with more expensive solutions. It turns out you can use GPS for a rough location and a fancy $200 gyroscope for millimeter precision. Then just plant the seeds on an exact grid and you know that anything not on the grid is a weed.

And actually, his suggestion was to use high-pressure water jets to cut the weeds instead of lasers. It would/could be less energy-intensive.


RTK GPS is used as a second factor to vision in these machines. It’s just not good enough to target with as a sole / primary factor in the real world though. Bit of drift and whoops, $30,000 of crop gone.

Lasers are not used because they’re expensive and dangerous. And Co2 lasers (as per the machine in the article) are powerful but super fragile.

Water shooting around at high pressure is in no way efficient or easy to handle.

Compressed light is the technology that’s actually going to be used for precision weeding. It has the speed, power and simplicity of lasers, without the cost and danger: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/activity:67899797724715...


Its like cabling or rails have never been used before to guide a machine along its intended path. Alternatively, markers could be placed at planting.


Thanks for posting this, very interesting. The linkedin profile pointed to a youtube video (unlisted) that was pretty interesting and covered how they could calculate eye safely using simple math that indicated the safe distance was 2 meters away. They appeared to be using blue LEDs at high intensity to char-or-inactivate weed photosynthesis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnL3zYhBlVs


it'll probably end up being something like a gamma ray source; as probably the cheapest and most durable solution.


Yes, and much of the non-livestock emissions from agriculture is from growing plants to feed to livestock!


And process it, and transport it, and process and transport the meat after we've slaughtered the livestock.

Part of meat's increased GHG emissions are because their are so many more steps in bringing it to market and because it doesn't last as long. Most plants are harvested, cleaned/processed, and transported to market. Livestock generally needs feed, which is harvested, cleaned/processed, and transported to the livestock, and after livestock is slaughtered, it needs to be cleaned/processed, and transported to market, and on top of that it tends to go bad faster.


This is so great.


This is bad.


This was the key line that stood out to me as well. I've seen both situations where individuals are jealous of successful people in resource-limited environments and where employees appreciate working with and helping high performers when resources are plentiful for everyone.


You kinda need a middle ground, because failing to compensate for performance can lead to resentment, and undermine your top talent just as much as jealous coworkers.

In essence, it depends on what you mean by "resources" and what you mean by "plentiful for everyone".


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: