When I make stock I usually follow the traditional route, but rather than discard the vegetables I stick my Bamix into the pot and let it run until the contents are silky smooth. (Think of the Bamix as a poor man’s Pacojet if you run it long enough :-)). This results in what can best be described as a runny purée.
If I’m making something that will be thickened there is no need to run the result through a fine meshed sieve. And most of the time when I cook that is the case. Which means no unnecessary waste.
If you want a broth then I suppose I could let it sit until the solids have settled and scoop off the liquid. What I usually do is go easy on the Bamix so the more of the solids are taken out by the sieve.
What would be more interesting would be to do both: juice first, the sautee and then cook the pulp and finally combine the two.
> I stick my Bamix into the pot and let it run until the contents are silky smooth
How do you like the Bamix? I was considering replacing my aging Kitchen Aid immersion blender (which I love, but it’s starting to fall apart) with either another Kitchen Aid, or a Braun, or a Bamix. The Bamix seems a very opinionated design, but interesting. Reviews I’ve seen are split between love/hate, though.
I'm a big fan of it. The business end has a very simple and open design that makes it work much better than other immersion blenders I've had. Since the end is all metal I can use it in boiling liquids with no problems. I don't put it in past the metal part, but apparently this bit is watertight as well. The motor is really good. Has a lot of oomph.
I saw a test where they put the bamix up against a few other immersion blenders and it did well. It wasn't the fastest, but among the fast ones. The thing that sets it apart is the clean and simple design. I've had mine for a bit over a decade without any problems.
I'm sure there are other products on the market that you should consider. I must admit that I have not kept abreast of immersion blender news. But I would have no problem recommending it. It is one of the most useful tools in my kitchen.
Not the op but I don't think it blends better than others. What I really don't like is the little split in the removable blade where food sticks into and you can only remove using a dental floss or a folded piece of paper. Knowing that I would have got one with a fixed blade.
I just throw the blade in the dishwasher and it has come out clean every time.
You're right that it isn't as fast as some other blenders, but I think it makes up for it with the simple and durable design. I can live with having to run it for a bit longer.
I do something similar! Usually I will lightly fry or roast the scraps before blending in the vitamix, then straining. It’s great. I am also getting into flavoring oils/fats in a similar way.
I remember really wanting this at the time.
Amazing how jarring the design of the radio is in comparison to the rest of the interior.
Also, interesting how they didn't think to design their own entertainment system because... cars had third party entertainment systems that's just the way it was!
Cars should have third-party entertainment systems. Everything about 'infotainment' systems is a terrible idea, because integrating something that changes three to five times in the life of the vehicle is stupid.
Put a nicely anchored 1/4-20 UNC mount in two or three locations, put a USB port that speaks the standard audio protocol next to each one, and connect those to an integrated DSP/amplifier suitable for the car's speakers and microphones. It will be good for three times the life of the car, and make everyone's lives easier.
> Cars should have third-party entertainment systems. Everything about 'infotainment' systems is a terrible idea, because integrating something that changes three to five times in the life of the vehicle is stupid.
In my mind this has been largely solved for the past few years with Android Auto / Carplay. It would be nice if there was a true standard, but at the same time, there's only two phone operating systems so it works.
If you're not familiar with it, there are some huge benefits of the way it works:
* The system updates with your phone, not your car. Applies to both hardware and software.
* Data plans are also tied to your phone, which you presumably have anyway.
* Preferences are personal; my partner and I each get our own music, podcasts, and suggested destinations.
* Personally I love that my music/podcasts follow me around. I can browse and start listening to something in the car, then hours later throw in my wireless ear buds and continue from where I was while I mow the lawn.
There is also some level of upgradability from the car side, too: I recently added a wireless android auto adapter to my 2016 car. It was under $100, plugs into USB, and once I got it paired to my phone, I basically get in and start the car and in a few seconds the UI is there.
What I am skeptical about is that this will continue to be solved for the next few years: there's always that chance that Google will outright kill it, or Apple/Samsung/whoever will become exclusive to a single car manufacturer, or the manufacturers will somehow bungle this up with a subscription model of some sort.
Carplay &co are good right now, but as someone that hangs on to cars for a long time, the trouble is that phones have a much faster lifecycle than a car, and are pretty unlikely to continue to work as smoothly as they do 20 years down the line.
For example, I just junked a radio with a 30 pin ipod connector. It was great and smooth in its day, but now, not so much.
Could be we'll get lucky and the phones of 2043 will work with the cars of 2023, but I think it's more likely that the car will work and the infotainment stack will be a half-functional ghost mall of tech in the middle of the car
> and are pretty unlikely to continue to work as smoothly as they do 20 years down the line.
This is a fair point... but also just what happens with technology and time.
I assume you junked the radio not because it was broken (that can happen to any gear) but because the 30-pin interface itself is no longer desired -- it's no longer the best way to get the content you want (ie: from your phone).
This isn't really a different situation from a 20-year-old car (CD player), 35-year-old car (cassette deck) or 50-year-old car (8-track).
20 years from now, if there's a market for it and it's technically possible, someone will make adapters to get AA/Carplay units to be compatible with whatever the current technology is -- basically the 2043 equivalent of a cassette adapter.
In my mind this has been largely solved for the
past few years with Android Auto / Carplay.
I mean, yeah -- absolutely. For all the reasons you say.
But auto companies like Tesla and GM are now working hard to unsolve it because there's no profit in it for them. They want to control the experience and extract sweet, sweet subscription revenue. So, I'm not sure how "solved" it is.
> What I am skeptical about is that this will continue to be solved for the next few years: there's always that chance that Google will outright kill it, or Apple/Samsung/whoever will become exclusive to a single car manufacturer, or the manufacturers will somehow bungle this up with a subscription model of some sort.
Or the manufacturers decide they don't like users bypassing their revenue models:
FWIW, I absolutely love Carplay and paid extra to have compatible head units installed in any of my previous cars that didn't have built in support. It's been fantastic, but I don't trust manufacturers to do what's in my own best interest.
See also the recent Mozilla privacy findings for cars.
Every cars produced from 1970s until yesterday afternoon have one of that kind of standard mounting, colloquially called 1DIN and 2DIN form factors. It's the shape of old car radios and cassette player front panels. If you've ever wondered if it's actually removable or it's just such an extremely uniform and coincidental choice of aesthetics, it's actually a standard slot. And there are endless aftermarket options. Very few cars lacked support for it, but it's since been de facto deprecated and being replaced by Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.
That is not standardised across different headphone manufacturers and often doesn’t work. It doesn’t work at all on cars.
Analog protocols are not a good idea for this. Digital with a decent protocol is much more reliable, whether wired or not. In practice, the best option is either wired CarPlay/Auto or bluetooth.
I used to think this. But the quality and integration of the infotainment in new cars, for example Tesla, is so much better than any extern unit I have tested, that now I really appreciate the systems coming with the car.
I used to change the unit, amp and all speakers. Now my new car is just working nicely unmodified.
1st-gen Tesla are now 11 years old(first production is 2012). We already have answers and direction of motion; they won't bother engineering replacement screens for decade old cars, and they happily assist you with buying more cars when you think your gigacast has a hairline.
You need more than "the standard audio protocol". The infotainment system should know a lot about the car's state (e.g., RPM, turn signal activated/deactivated).
The car can feed media and mixing controls to the amplifier; there's no need to send that elsewhere. Strict separation of concerns. You want to play a "door is a jar" announcement? Tell the amplifier to reduce all the other channels to one-third their current volume and raise the announcement channel, then undo that. No need to involve the phone or tablet or mini-PC or MP3 player or subether radio.
How would the navigation app on CarPlay know whether or not you have turned on your turn signal ahead of a turn? Or know to pause navigation because the car is no longer in gear?
People don't use turn signals in Massachusetts; that's considered giving information to the enemy.
The navigation app has a clock, GPS location, and acceleration and orientation sensors available to it in the phone. If you miss your turn, it will notice and find the next best route.
Why would you want to pause navigation on a gear change? Velocity plus the connection to the vehicle tells you everything you need to know. Zero velocity but still connected? Keep displaying stuff; you might be parking and you might be in traffic. Disconnected but velocity is high? The passenger is going to use you; keep navigation alive in the background. Disconnected and velocity is zero or walking? Go back to powersave mode.
I want the nav system to quit reminding me to turn when it notices that I have signaled. I want to pause navigation when I stop at the gas station or make some other stop (when not in gear, not gear change; the nav system should know when the vehicle has parked). Integration between the nav system and the rest of the car is table stakes at this point. It’s okay that you only want music. Some of us have higher expectations from our cars.
For example, the nav system should know when the battery charge or gas tank level is not enough to get to the destination.
I want the car to provide every bit of information it has to the phone so it can do smart things with it.
I rent a lot of cars in lots of places and I am amused at how poorly some manufacturers are handling this. Yes, treating the phone like an iPod works. That worked more than a decade ago.
(I was amused by your comment about Massachusetts. I am fully aware that Massholes have no respect for each other or the rule of law. Every time I return a rental car to Logan in one piece is a victory.)
The sad thing, is that somewhere out there there’s an infotainment PM at an automotive company taking note of every item in your list and saying “let’s implement stuff like that in our infotainment system! It’ll be a (jazz hands) differentiator!”
The auto manufacturers still have this delusion that they’re competing with Apple and Google on infotainment, instead of seeing the truth that better phone integration is not only the technically better solution, it’s something the customers want, and something that saves the company money. But you can’t get someone to understand something when their salary requires that they not understand it.
Actually at the time Ford's in-car entertainment was more integrated than most. Unlike others, they fitted own-brand audio systems which were either non-standard shapes and hard to replace, or they were built in entirely. I think what we see here's just an afterthought that got added late in the design process.
> Also, interesting how they didn't think to design their own entertainment system because... cars had third party entertainment systems that's just the way it was!
This was rarely true in 1999, at least in the US.
They often had ones that were standard DIN or double-DIN size, but they were usually manufacturer-branded and styled with buttons that matched the rest of the car.
But if you google image search a 1999 Ford Taurus interior you'll see that not everyone was even then still sticking to the easily-swappable standard. Compare to 1999 Camry, which had standard size but came out of the factory with a Toyota-skinned radio of one sort or another depending on options.
In 1999 we still hadn't realized the wonder of reading mp3/wma files burned onto a CD. Aiwa was the first brand I remember opening that up. USB slots were next.
I spent the best part of a sunny Saturday trying to work out why an elderly relative’s HP printer wasn’t working.
The error messages were incredibly unhelpful (I like to believe they were too ashamed to tell you what was actually wrong).
Turns out their credit card was due to expire soon.
Was shocked when I found that was the issue & had a hard time explaining what had gone wrong.
I’ll definitely advise against HP printers going forward.
Yeah, I had to debug this with my MIL over the phone. Her card had expired and she ignored the many many many emails, and the printer had a light blinking, but it wasn't listed in the manual, and I don't use the service, so...
Once I figured out what the problem was, she was able to get the printer re-enrolled, but then it took a while for the printer to realize. And then, the ink was apparently dried up, because it didn't want to actually print. I don't have a problem with the HP printing plan, but clear messaging on the printer would help, and inkjets not being terrible would also help. (Also, it would help if my MIL wouldn't leave problems unsolved ... 'Ohh, it stopped working a few months ago', but that's a different issue)
