How does that work though, so say my bucket has 10,000 json files in it and I want all of them with the name attributes being like '%john'. Is that possible?
If I may put a bit of a cultural spin on this, his comment sort of reflects the culture in India, where a vast majority of people do not feel comfortable simply asking for a raise. Most people (men and women) essentially follow the strategy that Nadella suggested, to work harder and believe that you will be rewarded for it eventually. I'm not in any way suggesting that this is an effective strategy (especially for women), but it might explain his comment somewhat. Great apology, though.
I'm inclined to agree with the GP. Attitudes about money, negotiation and status are formed early in life and while you can outgrow them it's difficult to shake them off entirely.
I've been in the US nearly half my life (from Ireland originally) but I can't see myself getting used to that aspect of American business culture. My instinctive view is that if I'm you're employee and you're happy with my performance, it's your job to put your money where your mouth is, not mine to come to you asking for more. My compromise approach these days is that when someone solicits my help I ask them how much they've budgeted for the work they want done/ If the answer is not a positive sum, then I ask them what area they're willing to accept and equivalent loss of productivity.
Settle down, no need to sensationalize. That's not what even the OPs comment meant. Also, no, not everyone in India treats women like "chattel" (heck most of them worship them) and I'm pretty sure, neither does Satya.
I am not commenting on Satya in this reply, just the idea that either a) all women are treated like chattel in India or b) no women are treated like chattel in India. Neither of which of course is true.
Women's lack of equality in India, compared to the UK, are in general I'm afraid pretty appalling, when I was younger I nearly moved to India for a while. But my wife who is of Indian descent was extremely reluctant because of they way they are treated in India compared to the UK. The rights of women are minimal compared to men. That's just the reality.
On the other hand they are allowed out of the house unescorted, so as always it's a sliding scale.
Don't get me wrong India is home to some of the loveliest, kindest and gentlest people I have ever met. On average I'm pretty certain I'm a much less decent human being than the average Indian. It is a country which has many great qualities we can learn from over here, just not respect and equality for women. And that omission, like the caste system, is very saddening. But hey I have a huge log in my eye :-)
People worship their cars, personally I wouldn't equate desire with respect.
Again, it's hard to generalize but for the modern woman, I think it's no worse than what you'd find in the western world. Until last year, the most powerful politician in India was an Italian-Indian woman (again this might not mean anything but it shows that it's not ingrained into people). Also, given the population, you might hear more cases of inequality. But please don't let that affect your general view of India.
The caste system, I'm very sorry to say this, your ancestors are partly to blame for as well. Like we all know divide and conquer goes a long way in sorting out issues :-). But it used to be societal classification based on one's occupation (and people were free to move across strata as well) which allowed for easy governance. Anyway, today it's pretty much non-existent and is more a class system than anything else (it's a corollary that the highest castes are the richest class today). However, have enough money? Even the highest caste member will not mind handing his daughter over.
The caste system predates the Buddha (500BC) btw. and is routed in Hindu culture.
The British actually also exploited the difference between Muslims and Hindus, but again didn't create the difference. Yes the Raj used divide and conquer, but they used differences that had existed for thousands of years and still do.
Dude, the distance from the east to the west of India is some 1200 miles, and north to south is around 2000 miles. The idea that you could describe the entire country in such simple cultural generalizations is as wrong as generalizing about people from LA and Kansas. Just the way you're talking about India is, while flattering, very uninformed. The US is also home to lovely and kind people, as well as people capable of monstrosity. The caste system is irrelevant in many parts of India -- it's not even a consideration! It's like not wanting to visit 1960s New York because, you know, all the lynching and the Jim Crow laws.
I have visited India multiple times, my in-laws are Indian, it's not a country I'm completely ignorant of and I'm saying nothing out of ignorance, but direct experience of the unequal status of women in Indian society compared to Western society.
You can make generalisations when doing a comparison with cultures, but not when prejudging individuals.
For example the US is wealthier than Algeria. That is a generalisation based on an aggregate (the total GDP), but doesn't reflect the individual status of people within each country. I.e. some Algerians will be wealthier than some Americans.
> For example the US is wealthier than Algeria. That is a generalisation ...
No, that's a statement of fact for some definition of wealth.
> ... but doesn't reflect the individual status of people within each country. I.e. some Algerians will be wealthier than some Americans.
This is simply a recognition that your fact applies to the whole and does not hold for every possible pairwise comparison.
My issue is that you cannot generalize about any cultural phenomenon in India. You can state some facts you've seen, but India is,
* a country dominated by three distinct religions,
* in some places resembles New York or Paris
* while in others it the remotest parts of Afghanistan
* and still in other parts more closely resembles Tibet
So to say that you could make one statement about the status of Indian women is misguided.
I'm glad you enjoy (presumably?) your Indian family and your trips there, but your experience is limited, and still that of a foreigner. A person having lived their whole life in India could hardly be expected to give a coherent assessment of the situation, much less so with you. The question itself is rooted in a level of imprecision which makes it useless when applied to a country as diverse as India.
That true. They could've simply linked to the IE9 download page.
But I think MS's algorithm would have de-ranked the site because any IR algorithm considers the content of the page too - if the web page served to IE users is about redirecting to browser download pages, their crawler (which may identify itself as IE) might not consider it to be the best result about 'Kogan'.
The idea is not to get rid of the data that is stored in the cookie. But instead to move it into the localStorage. Still acessible through JS and doesn't ge into the HTTP request.
Yes, but you wouldn't have to send the cookie to Google's servers every page load. This is a great use of the localStorage or sessionStorage in HTML5. Another obvious benefit we will see when using sessionStorage in specific is that you can store your session ID in that storage space and not have to worry about logging in from a new tab causing a session to overflow from one tab to the other.
Cookies are shared between browser sessions, but sessionStorage is not. localStorage is the same way except it persists over browser sessions and between tabs.
