While it is possible, it is certainly less than stellar compared to the other languages that were reviewed. Granted my experience was 1 - 2 yrs ago with .Net Core 5. I recall having to deal with setting different temp directories each time I wanted to run a another instance of a 'single binary' because the first thing it did was unzip the bundled runtime into the system wide TEMP directory. It certainly was a single file app but behaved more like an installer.
Whoever came up with that obviously didn't understand the why of single .exe applications.
It could be. I only use it on my Lenovo idea pad S540 AMD / Ryzen 5. However, the overall user experience with Win10 just doesn't click with me, compared to e.g. Ubuntu Desktop. The thing feels slow, bloated and unstable. Not to mention the tendency to always stay connected and report telemetry of many kinds (you notice this when you are on a slow / intermittent connection).
Pointers in Rust behave the same way. The problem is that the "array index" operator in Rust returns a reference to the indexed element, not a pointer, and references must be safely dereferenceable.
If you're full time you do, which is why Walmart and other big non-union companies strive as much as possible to have a part-time workforce. If you're part of corporate, or management, you're full time..
"Beyond competitive pay, you can receive incentive awards for your performance. Other great perks include 401(k) match, stock purchase plan, paid maternity and parental leave, PTO, multiple health plans, and much more."
I've yet to see any evidence of the importance of the building other than the fact it housed the press. What does Israel gain from bombing the building other than suppressing and disrupting the media? What physical asset could have possibly been in that building that could not have been relocated in the preceding hour?!
It housed some hamas offices. Even if they took out some computers, disrupting operations (communication, etc) still achieves targets.
Given modern technology (satellite and mobile links), it's hardly possible to "suppress and disrupt the media" as everybody can see. If there is somebody who does suppression of media in gaza it will be hamas: wrong reporting and you are in best case expelled an in worst case dead.
What you said about disrupting operations in the building applies to the media organizations in the building, too. There is a gaping logical chasm between these two statements:
> Even if they took out some computers, disrupting operations (communication, etc) still achieves targets.
> Given modern technology (satellite and mobile links), it's hardly possible to "suppress and disrupt the media" as everybody can see.
Disrupting media operations by blowing up their facilities and equipment is clearly deleterious to their ability to report news. You claim that media organizations are largely unaffected but speculate that Hamas operations in the same building are affected. I find it difficult to wrap my head around the mental gymnastics required to believe those two things simultaneously.
It's like saying without evidence, "Verizon's operations in the World Trade Center were basically unaffected on 9/11, but Morgan Stanley's operations there were crippled."
There is a difference between media uploading media files and posting articles and for example intelligence/command center that have physical termination of multiple, physical secure lines of communications.
Media can take their laptops, get out and keep on uploading stuff 5 minutes later.
In case of intelligence/command center it will takes weeks to bring all the physical lines to new "secure" location in the city and to get/hookup whatever equipment is used to terminate them.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/deploying/singl...