Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | peblos's commentslogin

I left in 2010 and the consensus is very much the same among my friends, or at least some of them anyway.

I’m no longer eligible to have an opinion UK or local conversations. “how would you know”, “the city’s changed a lot since you left”, “why are people who chose to leave so interested in X”, statements specific to ex-pats.

For those from outside the UK, ex-pat (expatriate) as a singular term is almost always derogatory regardless of context or publisher.


I believe the issue people have with the term ex-pat is that it sounds like a fart-sniffing variation of "migrant" (or the derivatives "emigrant" or "immigrant").


It's kind of wild how people can't accept that anyone would want to leave the UK, plenty of people come here, they're leaving other places, so this must be the best place in the world.

If you don't like it you must be foreign; I'm not, I was born and raised in England to British parents. Nowhere did I say I was even planning to leave, I merely suggested that if things got worse I might have to consider it, and I was jumped on for that.

Things ARE getting worse, but I'm not at that point yet, maybe we'll have a miraculous turn around and our public services will improve and our economy will grow, I'm not even asking for it to be sunny for 3 months of the year, but if they don't, am I just supposed to sit here on a sinking ship with my children next to me?

And let's be real, it's not even about me at this point, it's about what is and what will be for my children, I've worked hard to give them a better life than I had as a kid, and I'll be damned if I don't do it.


I realise I’m judging the book (and possibly the authors) by the cover but Nielsen’s book cover is objectively more readable.

It’s also probably the only one that would still look new, or current, if it was released today


It seems like one is stuck in the past for good (well, the author and the book I suppose).


Still doesn't. I recently moved my vault to Dropbox and had to rename a bunch of filenames


> Capacitors can hold charge for a long time, so no touchy. It probably wouldn’t kill you, because capacitors don’t actually store that much energy9, but that doesn’t mean it couldn’t kill you, so, no touchy!

I'm recalling the time I was trying to load a "backed up" game on my original Playstation using the disc swap [0] method while the chassis was open.

Since I had the top lid off, I had to hold the disc tray closed button for it to spin up. While looking away to pick up the other disc my pinky moved and touched a capacitor and had me on the receiving end of a massive zap.

I've never touched a capacitor since, thank goodness.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDopEevII3o


I was once messing around with disassembling a digital camera, and accidentally touched the flash capacitor, which gave me a big shock, both figuratively and literally. I've also not touched anything that spicy since.


I tend to use testssl.sh (https://testssl.sh/), are there any major benefits to sslyze?

I’ve just tried running it a moment ago to compare. The output isn’t as organised/readable and it includes several tracebacks for failed checks (tlsv1.1, tlsv1.2, tlsv1.3, and compliance against Mozilla TLS configuration).

Always open to different tools but it seems testssl.sh is currently more complete


I've been using https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html for years now. Any major benefits to either of these?


I started using testssl after first using slabs.com.

As the other commenter mentioned, testssl.sh lets you can websites that aren’t public yet e.g. test environments or other private networks. As well as testing against starttls if you need to test encryption on a mail gateway.

It’s also configurable, meaning you can have it test tls protocols alone, or ciphers alone, client renegotiation alone making it quicker and easier to read if you are looking at specific areas


testssl.sh allows you to scan stuff inside private networks, supports custom ports/SNI, and things like StartTLS.


It’s been a while but I used a bunch of these tools continuously for years. I mostly always used sslyze, because it was very versatile and gave me the info I wanted, whether it was around ciphers, tickets, cert chain validations, etc. I think testssl.sh did almost or possibly everything I wanted, but not sure.

SSLyze also has a decent Python library.

The problem with it though is the license. I wanted to build it into some other tooling but the license held me back.

I ended up building my own tooling that did just what I needed and built an API around it.


Requirements are strict in other countries as well. It comes with the nature of the job.


A friend of mine found out he is color blind that way. Not the most common one which you can detect by the tests which are in every biology book here but a rarer variant which is immediately disqualifying. He had to go through weeks of testing as well if that was not the case. Though here you'd be place within 300km of your home so less issues of closeness to family.


> I hate the whole cyber"security" community.

Why do you hate the whole community?


Because it's them who have pushed so hard for this 2fa mess.


Yes, and fan is both loud and regularly running


Surprising that it gets such good battery life with a fan running all the time.


At least on the surface laptop 2 in my last role, I didn’t find the battery life to be all that great. Wasn’t terrible, just average


Selling 6 planes is nothing. It wouldn’t even cover the standby aircraft of many fleets. You need large orders to make it feasible, and you need a strong product to secure those orders. FedEx, UPS and co. aren’t going to fund you long term unless you have a product and you need good teams and good funding to even get you to that starting block.

Boom is probably the closest thing to what is suggested but many still doubt they will make it to production. That’s minimal investment though and mostly around options on orders, so they still need massive funding to get there. Rolls Royce and others have said it’s not viable to design an engine for them so now they have to design the airframe and the engine.

Bombardier is an example of why new entrants should be concerned. As soon as you become a close threat, you don’t really trigger competition you trigger massive protectionism which forces them to sell the design to airbus, further consolidating the market

I think the incumbents would have to be broken up to seed any new competition that is remotely viable. The Boeing story has some way to go yet though, who knows


Obviously, selling 6 planes is not the end goal. But you have to sell 6 before you sell 600. Pre-selling an aircraft or two to a few shipping companies would pose a low risk investment to those companies, but provide a great lift for a struggling new hopeful. Look at how that worked for Rivian.

Your example of engines is an excellent point. Repeat that story 100 times to begin to understand the enormous difficulty. Which is to say, it won't be easy. I hope I didn't communicate that I thought it would be easy.

The story of Bombardier is maddening because it demonstrates that if you achieve unbelievably great things technically, you can still be assassinated by a million other attacks. The non-technical parts are what really seem to make this all a non-starter. But victory belongs to the bold.

And wouldn't it be a worthwhile ride to spend the next 20 years building incredibly cool stuff that eventually fails for whatever reason? Sign me up.


This Asianometry video [0] explains why it is so difficult to develop and market new planes.

tl;dr The main obstacles are supply chain inefficiencies and that no one buys planes that aren't cost-effective.

[0] Japan's Commercial Jet Failure https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkmtrsE9Jfg


Great link. Thanks.

I still say, sign me up.

As long as we're playing with somebody else's money it would be amazing to try and try again.


“Focus”. Looks like paring back of everything that doesn’t generate profit

https://www.cxtoday.com/data-analytics/the-purge-continues-t...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: