Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | outside2344's commentslogin

If S&P change their rules, I am going to sell my index funds, taxes be damned.

Sadly, this is not the only trash that is going to be hoisted on us retirement investors. OpenAI is waiting in the wings as well.

I am sure I am not the only one. That doesn't seem like it will be good for the market.


I am considering the same. Of course this happens to be a bad time to sell with the Iran war. Maybe we finally found the real reason for the war (only 90% sarcastic).

> Of course this happens to be a bad time to sell

I mean… it is still up 63% over the last 5 years. It’s not a bad time at all.


I still want to be long in the market so my initial thought is switching to equal weight funds.

If equal-weight funds got more popular, couldn't they end up distorting the price of the smaller-cap companies within an index

It's a good point, maybe? Even the smallest market cap is $22B though, hard to say.

I'm invested in VTI, VXUS, and VT in various places, so I'm definitely going to be buying it whether I want to or not

If it's any consolation , VTI is free-float weighted so won't pick up very much SpaceX initially.

I sent a note to my rep at Vanguard warning that they better not change the VTI rules to buy into this scam.

VTI is market cap free-float weighted, as is VOO and SPY. So what ETFs would this IPO be an issue with if not these?

So far only the Nasdaq-100 has gone along with SpaceX's special weighting chicanery. The biggest fund which tracks the Nasdaq-100 is QQQ. Suffice to say, if you have money in QQQ you should be re-considering that position.

There were extensive discussions previously about passive investors being taken for a ride:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47392550

And Michael Burry also wrote a long post about it:

https://x.com/michaeljburry/status/2032483200404992209

The question is what can we do about it? Nasdaq finalized these rule changes already. It seems like this got rammed through and now it is happening. And I don't expect Trump's corrupt SEC to do anything about it. Who else can we appeal to?


[flagged]


You can praise the technological achievements while still thinking the underlying business is trash. Plenty of horrible companies have generated great advances, but your money in them before mine thank you very much.

It is trash. They took one of the most successful private companies in the history of the world and made it baghold xAI.

At least it’s not Meta Llama

I used to agree until the xAI acquisition. Now IPO buyers will be buying debt from a shit tier dumpster fire to get access to SpaceX.

I hate that I will have to invest in this crap with my retirement index funds

Not sure why you are being downvoted. This is exactly what is happening and why OpenAI is trying to IPO to dump their garbage as well.

maybe it's the histrionics? Thse personalities are inevitably inflating their own balloons in order to cash out, but that doesn't mean the reality is these companies are worthless. The downvotes come from comments like "OpenAI is trying to dump their garbage". At best that's a silly thing to say. We can argue "fair market value" but it's not zero.

What is the fair market value of an AI company that loses >$10B/year? Of course they have assets that could be stripped and sold for profit but public creditors come last. It's also going to be no where near their private valuation.

because its not accurate. they're milking the market. not dumping on the market.

they're only (sic) going for 75 billion. with an evaluation in the trillion mark.

This is just more speculative investment. you'll see this again in another year or so with a bigger evaluation on it... it's how the modern economy now "works".


We really are trying our best to make Terminator reality aren't we?

Maybe drones will make human soldiers unacceptable in the future.

“It occurred to me that if I could invent a machine - a gun - which could by its rapidity of fire, enable one man to do as much battle duty as a hundred, that it would, to a large extent supersede the necessity of large armies, and consequently, exposure to battle and disease [would] be greatly diminished.” ― Richard Jordan Gatling, 1877

Should write a MIT case study on that in "Bad Hypotheses 101"

It's hard to explain without spoilers, but Isaac Asimov's The Feeling of Power (1958) is relevant to this concept of warfare.

If only wars would end when all the soldiers on one side were dead.

If the people fought before they'll keep fighting, even after their robots are gone.


They will certainly make human soldiers unviable. (I draw mostly dystopian conclusions from that prediction.)

Or it will just lead to lopsided massacres like the maxim gun did.

On the plus side there is now quite a lot of drone on drone combat saving people's lives

They are being operated by humans

But imagine the efficiencies to be gained if you swapped out the direct human operator with an automated operator. Then, you can have teams of automated operators being operated by a single human!

There was never any other option, given the direction of progress and basic human nature.

I know I know, but this and that and not me nor you, yet here we are and this is just beginning.


... Enterprise Edition

... LTSC

Really? I use Github Copilot. It is great actually, and I actually prefer it to Claude (loosely held opinion tho).

They do own some vertically integrated products like PeopleSoft that use these lower level foundational pieces. But I agree, I don't know why anyone in their right mind would use Oracle outside of golf and sailing bribes.

If you haven't watched No Other Land, you should: https://www.npr.org/2025/01/31/nx-s1-5279398/oscar-documenta...

>>"If we don't take it, somebody else will..."

The mental gymnastics of this sociopathic "culture" — terror masked as religious prophecy [0].

Modern newspeak twist: "forceful taking of Lebanese territory" == invasion

You can call me whatever you want, I'm just the heartbroken messenger.

[0] e.g: <https://old.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/1s3ncbn/journalist...>


Is it just in 1.82.8 or are previous versions impacted?

1.82.7 is also impacted if I remember correctly.

1.82.7 doesn't have litellm_init.pth in the archive. You can download them from pypi to check.

EDIT: no, it's compromised, see proxy/proxy_server.py.


1.82.7 has the payload in `litellm/proxy/proxy_server.py` which executes on import.

How is this industry still an industry?

People love gambling. Get rich quick pitches have always been popular.

Now, as to why the SEC hasn’t regulated crypto out of existence.. I refer you to dementia Don


Joe had 4 years, Barack had 8. The office of the president doesn't seem motivated to regulate crypto

Regulation (laws) are handled by the Congress, not the Executive.

Congress has passed laws to delegate details to the executive departments. Congress lacks the expertise to do any kind of precision in regulation.

Yet they do it all the time. Constantly.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: