> I dont care what side of the issue your on, you cant think this is ok.
IIRC, this is just some (anti-vax?) attorney being maximally biased and ginning up controversy to help his side.
The time estimate result is probably just simple consequence of a massive request + strict FOIA review requirements (perhaps legally mandated and not optional) + limited budget and staff.
Frankly, I don't want the FDA wasting my tax dollars to hire a bunch of staff just to make this guy quit complaining.
I've met two of their devs randomly in different Discord servers. Both were great people (Noah, Olaf) and are very active in OSS communities. Perhaps not coincidentally, both worked on Language Server related stuff.
Ólafur is responsible for a lot of Scala tooling and some pretty neat original ideas.
Sourcegraph also came up with LSIF, which is useful format for building tooling for language servers:
Sourcegraph CEO here. I'm really sorry about that. We work really hard on making our interviews good for everyone, including documenting it publicly at https://handbook.sourcegraph.com/talent/interview_process. Could you please email me at sqs@sourcegraph.com so I could find out what happened?
I interviewed for Sourcegraph and it was one of the best. Super transparent process, open source handbook, fun coding tasks -- really nothing to complaint about. Would be curious to know what made you have such a different experience.
don't underestimate some of the problems the author listed here. Language barriers & timezone challenges will cause the roadmap to move so much slower that you've lost gains on saving that 3/4 price.
Author here, I haven't had time to play around with it, but this library[0] from Atlassian looks like a "best of the both worlds" styling approach: CSS-in-JS authorship without the runtime penalty.
If you like the idea of tailwind and don't want to look at utility classes and still want the power of styled-components or react-emotion I'd check out Chakra UI [0].
The tooling is much less intertwined with other tooling and therefore less likely to cause problems, and the runtime performance impact is less. That's pretty neat.
the syntax of styled-components plays so nicely with actual reusable components. A mesh of tailwind syntax with reusable components feels weird. But mostly, a div with 10 classes each doing one small thing is so unreadable
I doubt the parent is talking about applying each of the tailwind util classes directly, but instead wrapping that combination of classes up into a reusable component to be applied around.
They're talking about the @apply directive. It takes a list of classes and creates a single class with those properties. Since Tailwind classes generally map almost 1-to-1 for CSS rules, it'd be easier in my opinion to just write the CSS directly.
I'm fully aware of what they're talking about. It's common usage in Tailwind to extract large collections of the utility classes back into reusable component classes which can be applied with a single @apply directive [1]. This being the case, this would not be a 1-to-1 mapping at all.
Everyone in big tech knows product direction comes top down with tons of product reviews along the way. There is no way you have this big of a screw up without major culture issues or more likely, leadership wanted to gamble and didn't think it would be this bad.
The workforce gets the consequences for leaderships decisions
I suppose I fall in the a republican camp so i'll bite.
College is too expensive for what it gives. You gain a ton in maturity, soft skill building but unless you're in a STEM major, the material does not prepare you for the real world. Depending on what my kid wants to study, I will not be encouraging college.
So much journalism is so insanely biased. I respectfully disagree to anyone who thinks Biden is treated the same as Trump was.
I don't deny covid's existence at all. I took it very seriously in the beginning of the pandemic. But as more data came out, I realized it wasn't a big deal for my age group. I later got covid and only lost sense smell/taste for 4 days. Didn't feel the need to miss any work (remote job).
I don't like the boomer-esque decisions some of these republicans make in regards to tech security, abortion, or cannabis but I guess I have to side with that over freedom reducing laws, excessive money printing, and increased taxes
Excessive money printing that also happened under an R admin? Freedom reducing laws like laws that limit the freedom to access a safe abortion? Or laws that limit the freedom to vote? What freedoms specifically?
Increased taxes for who? Taxes were massively cut for wealthy people a couple years ago and the only proposal to raise them that got any traction recently didn’t even raise them back to the previous level - still a net cut.
Also, Covid is a big deal for the families of the 600k dead from it directly and the unknown number indirectly due to inability to access medical services. Just because it didn’t affect you personally doesn’t mean it’s not a real problem.
I took it seriously as well, realized it probably wouldn’t kill me, but still followed precautions so as to avoid hurting others who would most likely have died or gotten seriously ill. I feel like that’s a pretty minimum requirement for a functioning society - compassion for others, who are not in your exact situation.
All fair points on the money printing parts. I am well aware Trump printed trillions as well. I wasn't a fan then and not now.
state laws != federal laws. I am pro-choice but I think allowing states to make decisions for their own is good and the system is working as intended. I want states to have more freedom to legislate what their constituents want than a giant federal government making decisions for the whole nation.
The taxes proposed in the infrastructure bill are egregious. For the first time in my entire life I will make a decent amount of money this year and will bump right into top bracket. Giving the government over 50% is insane.
I never said covid wasn't a big deal, or that is wasn't a problem. Again, I said I took it seriously. But to have any sort of lockdowns/mandates at this point are not cool. Or make me choose between a job or some unnecessary medical treatment. the goal posts on vaccine metrics or herd immunity are constantly moved. No one talks about natural immunity. Biden has used excessively divisive language emboldening people who are pro vaccine to accost those who haven't received the vaccine.
You will get taxed 50% on the amount you make over X is what you mean, not that your total tax rate will be 50% - if that were actually the case. The top bracket is $400k for an individual and the Build Back Better or whatever it’s called act proposes to raise that tax rate to 39.6% I believe. I’m curious where you’re getting 50% from.
Vaccine mandates are a pretty normal requirement at a lot of places. I worked in healthcare - flu shots were mandatory with very rare exceptions. When I was a kid I had to have MMR, polio, whooping cough, etc, vaccines to be able to enroll in school. This sudden “but muh freedom” crap doesn’t really hold up to scrutiny when the same party saying vaccines should be optional because it is a personal medical choice is the same group saying other medical procedures (that are potentially necessary) should be banned (abortion, in case that wasn’t clear) - even though they are also personal medical choices and nobody is trying to even mandate them.
Ah good point. I forgot about states with income taxes. But I still think the “50% of my income” number is wrong - he either doesn’t understand how tax brackets work is being willfully misleading to make his argument look better.
You're probably completely unaware that the excessive money printing (quantitative easing) you seemingly blame on democrats was proposed and initially implemented by by a Bush appointee (Bernanke) and then more recently and more famously done by a Trump appointee (Powell), both in cases where the alternative would've been a global financial catastrophe not seen since the great depression.
