I click on "Suggest Workflow" -> record -> "Submit Workflow" But now I cant find my workflow or any script I can copy. Its quite non-intuitive to use the product. Could you point where I can play my recorded workflow or edit it?

I went through the same thing. I'm not sure what it means to "suggest" a workflow. I tried both of the extensions and just couldn't figure out how to build a workflow for myself, and couldn't find anything like what this blog post is talking about :-/

I am sorry I think you might have installed the our workflow plugin(close ended agent) instead of agent4 (open ended). Its a new experiment we are working. We are working on the website messaging.

Agent4 - https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/agent4/kipkglfnhnpb...

Old workflow plugin - https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/100xbot/dhcenlmiiom...

Is there a way to file lawsuits for such cases? These incidents lead to death of open-source and crush hearts of open-source developers.

Seems like this would be a pretty open and shut case of copyright infringement.

Pursuing something like this would perhaps cost more than 200k in the US. And then the startup would likely just fold and you get nothing in return.

Sending a DMCA takedown notice is free.

Unfortunately law being too expensive to pursue makes it practically non-existent. All IP/copyright etc. laws are complete bs because of this.

A large corporation can just roll over you and then say sorry and maybe pay some pocket change money

Hire a lawyer to send a legal notice. Costs practically nothing and since it's an open and shut case, free money for the lawyer (if they charge based on damages), or the startup caves and shuts down.

Absolutely. The lawsuit probably wouldn't get very far when it comes to damages, however...

I believe that BusyBox sued over violations like 17 years ago. I am not aware of any other instances.

Wikipedia has a list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_license_litigation

Software Freedom Conservancy is currently suing Vizio. The interesting thing about this lawsuit is that it aims to make it possible for any recipient of GPL code sue for compliance, instead of requiring the copyright holder to sue.

https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html

It's always possible to try, especially as it seems there was a technical violation here, but whether it's worth it or likely to gain enough legal traction to yield results is another story, especially in instances of "your AI generated boiler plate looks like my AI generated boilerplate, and therefore is theft"